<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ryan's Tech Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog</link>
	<description>mostly tech, mostly rants</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on brief list of things that make working in C# frustrating by Ann Onymouse</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2008/02/13/brief-list-of-things-that-make-working-in-c-frustrating/#comment-12019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Onymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2008/02/13/brief-list-of-things-that-make-working-in-c-frustrating/#comment-12019</guid>
		<description>Most of this pertains to ASP only. Not C#. ASP is a huge piece of crap, but should you really let C# take blame for this?

I find myself adding IPublicViewState to every ASP project I've ever done. Why oh why didn't ASP think of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of this pertains to ASP only. Not C#. ASP is a huge piece of crap, but should you really let C# take blame for this?</p>
<p>I find myself adding IPublicViewState to every ASP project I&#8217;ve ever done. Why oh why didn&#8217;t ASP think of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Codeplex wastes six months reinventing wheels by Toby</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12018</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12018</guid>
		<description>@ Eddie Garcia, Svn 1.5 brings mature branch/merge tracking. Not bad for $0.00, eh. Plus there are a lot of things Svn does *better* then Perforce, etc.

@ Eric B, I hope other commenters have persuaded you that there was actually quite a bit technically wrong with CVS. Certainly Svn is the "compelling replacement" and one would never feel comfortable with CVS again after adopting it.

@ all the astroturfers: Bwahahaha....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Eddie Garcia, Svn 1.5 brings mature branch/merge tracking. Not bad for $0.00, eh. Plus there are a lot of things Svn does *better* then Perforce, etc.</p>
<p>@ Eric B, I hope other commenters have persuaded you that there was actually quite a bit technically wrong with CVS. Certainly Svn is the &#8220;compelling replacement&#8221; and one would never feel comfortable with CVS again after adopting it.</p>
<p>@ all the astroturfers: Bwahahaha&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Codeplex wastes six months reinventing wheels by Martin Zugec</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12016</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Zugec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12016</guid>
		<description>100% agree - I was surprised when I tried to contact Microsoft regarding TFS (I was curious about advantages), we were premium customer.

They send "TFS specialist" - when I asked him how could TFS compare to our current setup with subversion (and some custom components), he asked "Subversion what?". 

That was very disappointing. Not to mention fact that we were engineers, not developers (and used SVN for scripts or some packages), so he should be much better informed than us :(

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree - I was surprised when I tried to contact Microsoft regarding TFS (I was curious about advantages), we were premium customer.</p>
<p>They send &#8220;TFS specialist&#8221; - when I asked him how could TFS compare to our current setup with subversion (and some custom components), he asked &#8220;Subversion what?&#8221;. </p>
<p>That was very disappointing. Not to mention fact that we were engineers, not developers (and used SVN for scripts or some packages), so he should be much better informed than us :(</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Codeplex wastes six months reinventing wheels by matt mc</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator>matt mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12013</guid>
		<description>The comments here are pretty funny. I am just glad everyone is finally using version control. With Visual Source Safe it was pretty ridiculous- in many cases you were safer not using it.

When we tried to use TFS (in late 2006) for the version control features we had to drop it in favor of Subversion because it was lacking a command line client. This meant that in order to check out the build I needed a GUI client installed (and licensed) on the server.  Needless to say, this makes a lot of build and deployment automation tasks more difficult.  I am glad to see that has been addressed, to the extent that it has.

TFS was also a lot of work to manage in terms of permissions and licensing- we wanted to able hit source control from anywhere- even RedHat and Solaris servers, log in, and go. I thought I was going to like the task integration part, but it had way too many features.  We were able to get started with svn and trac in 4 hours after a couple of weeks of messing around with TFS. 

I suppose MS is working on a distributed version control system next- or are they going to wait until git has been around for five years to see if it catches on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments here are pretty funny. I am just glad everyone is finally using version control. With Visual Source Safe it was pretty ridiculous- in many cases you were safer not using it.</p>
<p>When we tried to use TFS (in late 2006) for the version control features we had to drop it in favor of Subversion because it was lacking a command line client. This meant that in order to check out the build I needed a GUI client installed (and licensed) on the server.  Needless to say, this makes a lot of build and deployment automation tasks more difficult.  I am glad to see that has been addressed, to the extent that it has.</p>
<p>TFS was also a lot of work to manage in terms of permissions and licensing- we wanted to able hit source control from anywhere- even RedHat and Solaris servers, log in, and go. I thought I was going to like the task integration part, but it had way too many features.  We were able to get started with svn and trac in 4 hours after a couple of weeks of messing around with TFS. </p>
<p>I suppose MS is working on a distributed version control system next- or are they going to wait until git has been around for five years to see if it catches on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Codeplex wastes six months reinventing wheels by Sarath C</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12012</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarath C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12012</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is capable of doing things. they've best resources and products. When you're playing with web a google like approach would be better I think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is capable of doing things. they&#8217;ve best resources and products. When you&#8217;re playing with web a google like approach would be better I think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Codeplex wastes six months reinventing wheels by Bill Barry</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/03/27/codeplex-wastes-six-months-reinventing-wheels/#comment-12010</guid>
		<description>reply posted here: http://16randombytes.blogspot.com/2008/07/reinventing-wheel.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reply posted here: <a href="http://16randombytes.blogspot.com/2008/07/reinventing-wheel.html" rel="nofollow">http://16randombytes.blogspot.com/2008/07/reinventing-wheel.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Restart a windows service remotely by Shubhashish</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/01/04/restart-a-windows-service-remotely/#comment-11985</link>
		<dc:creator>Shubhashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/01/04/restart-a-windows-service-remotely/#comment-11985</guid>
		<description>Indeed a helpfull note to follow, but the solution you are talking about, I doubt whether it will work in Windows 2000 /VISTA , since  both of them lacking the sc.exe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed a helpfull note to follow, but the solution you are talking about, I doubt whether it will work in Windows 2000 /VISTA , since  both of them lacking the sc.exe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Migrate PuTTY saved sessions by Shan Shanmuganathan</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/02/22/migrate-putty-saved-sessions/#comment-11968</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan Shanmuganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/02/22/migrate-putty-saved-sessions/#comment-11968</guid>
		<description>Thank you. Made my life easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Made my life easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;manual or distributed transaction mode&#8221;, ruby, rails, mssql, ado by joby Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/11/26/manual-or-distributed-transaction-mode-ruby-rails-mssql-ado/#comment-11921</link>
		<dc:creator>joby Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/11/26/manual-or-distributed-transaction-mode-ruby-rails-mssql-ado/#comment-11921</guid>
		<description>This is a very good  fix when we are doing more query update in one migration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good  fix when we are doing more query update in one migration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Migrate PuTTY saved sessions by Ken Woodward</title>
		<link>http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/02/22/migrate-putty-saved-sessions/#comment-11532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryepup.unwashedmeme.com/blog/2007/02/22/migrate-putty-saved-sessions/#comment-11532</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ryan.
That was very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan.<br />
That was very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in -0.784 seconds -->
